Seller's Property Disclosure - Residential

--- ## Page 1 ### Seller's Property Disclosure – Residential **kw** **KELLERWILLIAMS.** **REALTY · ST. PETE** **Notice to Licensee and seller:** Only the **Seller** should fill out this form. **Notice to Seller:** Florida law requires a **Seller** of a home to disclose to the **Buyer** all known facts that materially affect the value of the property being sold and that are not readily observable or known by the **Buyer**. This disclosure form is designed to help you comply with the law. However, this disclosure form may not address every significant issue that is unique to the Property. You should think about what you would want to know if you were buying the Property today; and if you need more space for additional information, comments, or explanations, check the Paragraph 12 checkbox and attach an addendum. **Notice to Buyer:** The following representations are made by **Seller** and **not** by any real estate licensee. This disclosure is not a guaranty or warranty of any kind. It is not a substitute for any inspections, warranties, or professional advice you may wish to obtain. It is not a substitute for your own personal judgment and common sense. The following information is based only upon **Seller's** actual knowledge of the Property's condition. **Sellers** can disclose only what they actually know. **Seller** may not know about all material or significant items. You should have an independent, professional home inspection to verify the condition of the Property and determine the cost of repairs, if any. This disclosure is not a contract and is not intended to be a part of any contract for sale and purchase. **Seller** makes the following disclosure regarding the property described as: _______________________________________________________________ (the "Property") The Property is [ ]owner occupied [ ]tenant occupied [ ]unoccupied (If unoccupied, how long has it been since **Seller** occupied the Property? _______________________________ | | **Yes** | **No** | **Don't Know** | |---|---|---|---| | **1. Structures; Systems; Appliances** | | | | | (a) Are the structures including roofs: ceilings; walls; doors; windows; foundation; and pool, hot tub, and spa, if any, structurally sound and free of leaks? | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | | (b) Is seawall, if any, and dockage, if any, structurally sound? | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | | (c) Are existing major appliances and heating, cooling, mechanical, electrical, security, and sprinkler systems, in working condition, i.e., operating in the manner in which the item was designed to operate? | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | | (d) Does the Property have aluminum wiring other than the primary service line? | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | | (e) Are any of the appliances leased? If yes, which ones: ____________________________ | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | | (f) If any answer to questions 1(a) - 1(c) is no, please explain: _____________________________ | | | | | _________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | **2. Termites; Other Wood-Destroying Organisms; Pests** | | | | | (a) Are termites; other wood-destroying organisms, including fungi; or pests present on the Property or has the Property had any structural damage by them? | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | | (b) Has the Property been treated for termites; other wood-destroying organisms, including fungi; or pests? | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | | (c) If any answer to questions 2(a) - 2(b) is yes, please explain: _____________________________ | | | | | _________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | **3. Water Intrusion; Drainage; Flooding** | | | | | (a) Has past or present water intrusion affected the Property? | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | | (b) Have past or present drainage or flooding problems affected the Property? | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | | (c) Is any of the Property located in a special flood hazard area? | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | | (d) Is any of the Property located seaward of the coastal construction control line? | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | | (e) Does your lender require flood insurance? | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | | (f) Do you have an elevation certificate? If yes, please attach a copy. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | | (g) If any answer to questions 3(a) - 3(d) is yes, please explain: _____________________________ | | | | | _________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | --- ¹ *Johnson v. Davis*, 480 So.2d 625 (Fla. 1985). **Seller** (______) (______) and **Buyer** (______) (______) acknowledge receipt of a copy of this page, which is Page 1 of 4. SPDR-3 Rev 2/20 Serial#: 098427-100160-2439651 ©2020 Florida Realtors® Form Simplicity --- ## Page 2 ### 4. Plumbing **(a)** What is your drinking water source? ☐ public ☐ private ☐ well ☐ other **(b)** Have you ever had a problem with the quality, supply, or flow of potable water? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Don't Know **(c)** Do you have a water treatment system? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Don't Know If yes, is it ☐ owned ☐ leased? **(d)** Do you have a ☐ sewer or ☐ septic system? If septic system, describe the location of each system: _________________________________ **(e)** Are any septic tanks, drain fields, or wells that are not currently being used located on the Property? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Don't Know **(f)** Are there or have there been any defects to the water system, septic system, drain fields or wells? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Don't Know **(g)** Have there been any plumbing leaks since you have owned the Property? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Don't Know **(h)** Are any polybutylene pipes on the Property? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Don't Know **(i)** If any answer to questions 4(b), 4(c), and 4(e) - 4(h) is yes, please explain: _________________________________ ### 5. Roof and Roof-Related Items **(a)** To your knowledge, is the roof structurally sound and free of leaks? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Don't Know **(b)** The age of the roof is ______ years OR date installed ____________________ **(c)** Has the roof ever leaked during your ownership? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Don't Know **(d)** To your knowledge, has there been any repair, restoration, replacement (indicate full or partial) or other work undertaken on the roof? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Don't Know If yes, please explain: _________________________________ **(e)** Are you aware of any defects to the roof, fascia, soffits, flashings or any other component of the roof system? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Don't Know If yes, please explain: _________________________________ ### 6. Pools; Hot Tubs; Spas **Note:** Florida law requires swimming pools, hot tubs, and spas that received a certificate of completion on or after October 1, 2000, to have at least one safety feature as specified by Section 515.27, Florida Statutes. **(a)** If the Property has a swimming pool, hot tub, or spa that received a certificate of completion on or after October 1, 2000, indicate the existing safety feature(s): ☐ enclosure that meets the pool barrier requirements ☐ approved safety pool cover ☐ required door and window exit alarms ☐ required door locks ☐ none **(b)** Has an in-ground pool on the Property been demolished and/or filled? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Don't Know ### 7. Sinkholes **Note:** When an insurance claim for sinkhole damage has been made by the **Seller** and paid by the insurer, Section 627.7073(2)(c), Florida Statutes, requires --- ## Page 3 The user wants me to transcribe all visible text on this page as clean markdown. I need to: 1. Transcribe all text exactly as shown 2. Use ### for sections 3. Use **bold** for labels 4. Use markdown tables for tabular data 5. Use - bullets for lists 6. Preserve all numbers, dates, and values exactly as shown 7. Output ONLY the transcribed text - no commentary, no analysis, no preamble Let me go through the document carefully: Header area has "Yes", "No", "Don't Know" columns. Section 8: Homeowners' Association Restrictions; Boundaries; Access Roads - 8(a) about membership in HOA - Notice to Buyer paragraph - 8(b) proposed changes - 8(c) shared features - 8(d) encroachments - 8(e) boundary disputes - 8(f) legal action affecting HOA common areas - 8(g) subsurface rights - 8(h) access roads private/public - 8(i) explanation for yes answers Section 9: Environmental - 9(a) built before 1978 - 9(b) environmental hazards - 9(c) damage/cleanup/repair - 9(d) mangroves, archeological sites - 9(e) explanation Section 10: Governmental, Claims and Litigation - 10(a) legal/administrative claims - 10(b) special assessments - 10(c) PACE assessment - 10(d) litigation or claim - 10(e) insurance claims Footer with signatures and page info. Let me format this properly. For the checkboxes, I should represent them as ☐ or just leave them as is in the text. The user wants clean markdown, so I should use ☐ for empty checkboxes. The table structure for the Yes/No/Don't Know columns needs to be preserved. Let me write this out: First, the header row with Yes, No, Don't Know. Then Section 8. Then Section 9. Then Section 10. Then the footer. I'll use ### for the main sections (8, 9, 10). Actually, looking at the format, the main headers are "8. Homeowners' Association..." etc. Let me be careful with the table formatting. The Yes/No/Don't Know columns are aligned to the right side of the page, with questions on the left. In markdown, I can create a table with the questions in one column and the checkboxes in the next columns, or I can try to represent it as text with the checkboxes. Given the complexity, I think the best approach is to use a table for the main content where appropriate, or use a format that shows the checkboxes clearly. Actually, looking at standard transcription practices for forms, I should: 1. Keep the section headers as ### 2. Use **bold** for the question labels like **(a)** or **Notice to Buyer:** 3. For the Yes/No/Don't Know columns, I'll create a markdown table 4. For checkboxes, I'll use ☐ Let me try to format this: The top has three column headers: Yes, No, Don't Know Then the content flows with questions on the left and checkboxes on the right. I can format this as a table, or I can format it as text with the Yes/No headers at the top. Actually, looking at the layout, it's a form with questions and three checkbox columns. I'll transcribe it as: | | Yes | No | Don't Know | |---|---|---|---| | **8. Homeowners' Association Restrictions; Boundaries; Access Roads** | | | | | **(a)** Is membership... | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | But wait, some items have sub-parts or additional text that spans multiple lines. Let me look more carefully. 8(a) has a long paragraph, then Notice to Buyer (which is bold), then more text. Then 8(b), 8(c), etc. The Yes/No/Don't Know boxes appear to be aligned to the right of each question. Let me transcribe section by section: **Top right headers:** Yes No Don't Know **Section 8:** 8. Homeowners' Association Restrictions; Boundaries; Access Roads (a) Is membership in a homeowner's association mandatory or do any covenants, conditions or restrictions (CCRs) affect the Property? (CCRs include deed restrictions, restrictive covenants and declaration of covenants.) [Notice to Buyer text] ☐ ☐ ☐ (b) Are there any proposed changes to any of the restrictions? ☐ ☐ ☐ And so on. Actually, looking at the layout, the Yes/No/Don't Know column headers are at the top right, and each question has three checkboxes aligned with those columns. I think the cleanest way is to make a table with four columns: the question text, Yes, No, Don't Know. But some entries like 8(h) have fill-in blanks and sub-questions. Let me do my best to capture everything accurately. For 8(g), there's an "If yes" sub-question with yes/no boxes. For 8(h), there are boxes for private/public and a fill-in line. Let me start transcribing: | Yes | No | Don't Know | |:---:|:---:|:---:| | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | Wait, the headers are at the top. Let me look at the original again. The image shows: - Top right: "Yes", "No", "Don't Know" as column headers - Left side: Section 8 heading and questions - Right side: Checkboxes aligned with the headers I think I should format it as: ### 8. Homeowners' Association Restrictions; Boundaries; Access Roads | | Yes | No | Don't Know | |---|---|---|---| | **(a)** Is membership in a homeowner's association mandatory or do any covenants, conditions or restrictions (CCRs) affect the Property? (CCRs include deed restrictions, restrictive covenants and declaration of covenants.) | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | Then the Notice to Buyer text below that. Actually, the Notice to Buyer is part of 8(a) it seems, or associated with it. Let me read 8(a) again: "(a) Is membership in a homeowner's association mandatory or do any covenants, conditions or restrictions (CCRs) affect the Property? (CCRs include deed restrictions, restrictive covenants and declaration of covenants.)" Then "Notice to Buyer: If yes, you should read..." - this appears to be a note associated with 8(a). Then the checkboxes are to the right of (a). Then (b) with checkboxes. (c) with checkboxes. (d) with checkboxes. (e) with checkboxes. (f) with checkboxes. (g) with checkboxes and sub-question. (h) with private/public checkboxes and fill-in lines. (i) with fill-in lines. For (g), the sub-question "If yes, is there a right of entry?" has two boxes: ☐ yes ☐ no For (h), it says "Are access roads ☐ private ☐ public? If private, describe..." For (i), it says "If any answer to questions 8(a) - 8(g) is yes, please explain:" with a blank line. Then Section 9. Then Section 10. Then the footer. Let me transcribe this carefully: ### 8. Homeowners' Association Restrictions; Boundaries; Access Roads **(a)** Is membership in a homeowner's association mandatory or do any covenants, conditions or restrictions (CCRs) affect the Property? (CCRs include deed restrictions, restrictive covenants and declaration of covenants.) **Notice to Buyer:** If yes, you should read the association's official records and/or the CCRs before making an offer to purchase. These documents contain information on significant matters, such as recurring dues or fees; special assessments; capital contributions, penalties; and architectural, building, landscaping, leasing, parking, pet, resale, vehicle and other types of restrictions. ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Don't Know Wait, the column headers are at the very top. Let me check the layout again. Looking at the top of the image: - Top right has "Yes", "No", "Don't Know" aligned with three columns of checkboxes. - The checkboxes appear to be empty squares. For the transcription, I think I should put the column headers at the top, then list the questions with their checkboxes. But the user wants clean markdown. Let me think about the best format. Format option 1: Table | Question | Yes | No | Don't Know | |----------|-----|-----|------------| | 8(a) ... | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | But some items have long text that wouldn't fit well in a table cell, or have sub-parts. Format option 2: Text with checkboxes inline **(a)** Is membership... [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't Know But the original has the headers at the top, so the checkboxes align vertically. Format option 3: Use the headers as shown, then for each item show the checkboxes aligned. Actually, looking at real estate form transcriptions, usually they just transcribe the text and note the checkbox positions. But the user said "markdown tables for tabular data". Let me try a hybrid approach. For the main questions 8(a)-8(g), 9(a)-9(d), 10(a)-10(e), I'll use a table format. For the sub-questions and fill-ins, I'll break out of the table. Actually, looking at the form, the Yes/No/Don't Know applies to most questions, but some have different formats. Let me try: | Yes | No | Don't Know | |:---:|:---:|:---:| | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | Hmm, that's not right either. Let me look at the actual structure once more. The column headers "Yes", "No", "Don't Know" are at the top right. Each question (a, b, c, etc.) has three checkboxes to its right, under those headers. I think the best markdown representation is: ### 8. Homeowners' Association Restrictions; Boundaries; Access Roads | | Yes | No | Don't Know | |---|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **(a)** Is membership in a homeowner's association mandatory or do any covenants, conditions or restrictions (CCRs) affect the Property? (CCRs include deed restrictions, restrictive covenants and declaration of covenants.) | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | Then the Notice to Buyer text. Then: | **(b)** Are there any proposed changes to any of the restrictions? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | And so on. But wait - the Notice to Buyer is associated with (a), and the checkboxes for (a) are to the right of the main question, before the Notice text? Or is the Notice text below the checkboxes? Looking at the image, for 8(a): - The question text is on the left - To the right are three checkboxes - Below the question (and spanning the width) is the "Notice to Buyer" paragraph Actually, looking more carefully: The Notice to Buyer paragraph is indented and appears below the main question, but the checkboxes are aligned with the main question. Let me try to represent this accurately: ### 8. Homeowners' Association Restrictions; Boundaries; Access Roads **(a)** Is membership in a homeowner's association mandatory or do any covenants, conditions or restrictions (CCRs) affect the Property? (CCRs include deed restrictions, restrictive covenants and declaration of covenants.) | Yes ☐ | No ☐ | Don't Know ☐ | That doesn't look good in markdown. Let me try a different approach. I'll list the headers at the top right as they appear, then for each question I'll indicate the checkboxes. Actually, the simplest and cleanest way is: **Yes** **No** **Don't Know** Then for each item, put the checkboxes at the end. But the user said "markdown tables for tabular data". This suggests that when data is in a table format, I should use a markdown table. The form has a tabular structure for the Yes/No/Don't Know columns. Let me create a table with 4 columns: Item, Yes, No, Don't Know. For 8(a), the Item column would contain the question text. But the Notice to Buyer text makes it complicated. Actually, looking at standard form transcription practices, I think I should: 1. Put the three headers at the top: Yes, No, Don't Know (aligned right) 2. For 8(a), put the question, then on the same line or next line the three checkboxes 3. Put the Notice to Buyer as a block quote or indented text 4. Continue with (b), (c), etc. But "Output ONLY the transcribed text" means I should be thorough and accurate. Let me try this format: | | Yes | No | Don't Know | |---|---|---|---| | **8. Homeowners' Association Restrictions; Boundaries; Access Roads** | | | | | **(a)** Is membership in a homeowner's association mandatory or do any covenants, conditions or restrictions (CCRs) affect the Property? (CCRs include deed restrictions, restrictive covenants and declaration of covenants.) | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | **Notice to Buyer:** If yes, you should read the association's official records and/or the CCRs before making an offer to purchase. These documents contain information on significant matters, such as recurring dues or fees; special assessments; capital contributions, penalties; and architectural, building, landscaping, leasing, parking, pet, resale, vehicle and other types of restrictions. | **(b)** Are there any proposed changes to any of the restrictions? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(c)** Are any driveways, walls, fences, or other features shared with adjoining landowners? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(d)** Are there any encroachments on the Property or any encroachments by the Property's improvements on other lands? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(e)** Are there boundary line disputes or easements affecting the Property? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(f)** Are you aware of any existing, pending or proposed legal or administrative action affecting homeowner's association common areas (such as clubhouse, pools, tennis courts or other areas)? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(g)** Have any subsurface rights, as defined by Section 689.29(3)(b), Florida Statutes, been severed from the Property? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | If yes, is there a right of entry? ☐ yes ☐ no **(h)** Are access roads ☐ private ☐ public? If private, describe the terms and conditions of the maintenance agreement: _________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ **(i)** If any answer to questions 8(a) - 8(g) is yes, please explain: _________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ That looks pretty good. Now for section 9 and 10. Section 9: | **9. Environmental** | | | | | **(a)** Was the Property built before 1978? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | If yes, please see Lead-Based Paint Disclosure. | **(b)** Does anything exist on the Property that may be considered an environmental hazard, including but not limited to, lead-based paint; asbestos; mold; urea formaldehyde; radon gas; methamphetamine contamination; defective drywall; fuel, propane, or chemical storage tanks (active or abandoned); or contaminated soil or water? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(c)** Has there been any damage, clean up, or repair to the Property due to any of the substances or materials listed in subsection (b) above? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(d)** Are any mangroves, archeological sites, or other environmentally sensitive areas located on the Property? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | **(e)** If any answer to questions 9(b) - 9(d) is yes, please explain: _________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Section 10: | **10. Governmental, Claims and Litigation** | | | | | **(a)** Are there any existing, pending or proposed legal or administrative claims affecting the Property? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(b)** Are you aware of any existing or proposed municipal or county special assessments affecting the Property? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(c)** Is the Property subject to any Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) assessment per Section 163.08. Florida Statutes? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(d)** Are you aware of the Property ever having been, or is it currently, subject to litigation or claim, including but not limited to, defective building products, construction defects and/or title problems? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(e)** Have you ever had any claims filed against your homeowner's Insurance Policy? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | Footer: Seller (______) (______) and Buyer (______) (______) acknowledge receipt of a copy of this page, which is Page 3 of 4. SPDR-3 Rev 2/20 Serial#: 098427-100160-2439651 ©2020 Florida Realtors® Form Simplicity Wait, looking at the footer, there's "Form Simplicity" with a small icon. The text "Form Simplicity" appears to be there. Also, I need to check 8(h) carefully. It says: "Are access roads ☐ private ☐ public? If private, describe the terms and conditions of the maintenance agreement:" Then there are two blank lines. For 8(i), there are two blank lines. For 9(e), there are two blank lines. Let me double check the text for 10(c): "per Section 163.08. Florida Statutes?" - there's a period after 163.08. That looks like it might be a typo in the original or I need to check. Looking at the image: "per Section 163.08. Florida Statutes?" - yes, there's a period after 163.08. Now, checking 8(g) again: "Have any subsurface rights, as defined by Section 689.29(3)(b), Florida Statutes, been severed from the Property?" Then checkboxes. Then "If yes, is there a right of entry? ☐ yes ☐ no" So this "If yes" part is separate from the main table. Similarly for 9(a): "Was the Property built before 1978?" with checkboxes, then below "If yes, please see Lead-Based Paint Disclosure." Let me refine the structure: I'll start with the column headers, then section 8. Actually, looking at the top of the page, the column headers "Yes", "No", "Don't Know --- ## Page 4 The user wants me to transcribe all visible text on the page as clean markdown. I need to: 1. Use ### for sections 2. Use **bold** for labels 3. Use markdown tables for tabular data (the Yes/No/Don't Know columns) 4. Use - bullets for lists 5. Preserve all numbers, dates, and values exactly as shown 6. No commentary, no analysis, no preamble Let me look at the image carefully and transcribe everything. Starting from the top: There are questions (f) through (o) with Yes/No/Don't Know checkboxes. Then section 11 about FIRPTA. Then section 12 about Other Matters. Then the Seller representation paragraph. Then signature lines for Seller (two lines). Then Buyer acknowledgment. Then signature lines for Buyer (two lines). Then the bottom acknowledgment about page 4 of 4. Footer with SPDR-3 Rev 2/20 and serial number. Let me transcribe carefully: First section - questions 10(f) through 10(o) with the three columns: Yes, No, Don't Know. Actually looking at the layout, the Yes/No/Don't Know are column headers on the right side. Let me format this as a table or as a list with the three options. Actually, looking at it, it seems like the questions are on the left and the three checkbox columns are on the right. For markdown, I can make a table with the question text and the three columns. But the questions are long. Let me see: (f) Are there any zoning violations or nonconforming uses? (g) Are there any zoning restrictions affecting improvements or replacement of the Property? (h) Do any zoning, land use or administrative regulations conflict with the existing use of the Property? (i) Do any restrictions other than association or flood area requirements, affect improvements or replacement of the Property? (j) Are any improvements located below the base flood elevation? (k) Have any improvements been constructed in violation of applicable local flood guidelines? (l) Have any improvements to the Property, whether by you or by others, been constructed in violation of building codes or without necessary permits? (m) Are there any active permits on the Property that have not been closed by a final inspection? (n) Is there any violation or non-compliance regarding any unrecorded liens; code enforcement violations; or governmental, building, environmental and safety codes, restrictions or requirements? (o) If any answer to questions 10(a) - 10(n) is yes, please explain: _______________ Then Section 11: Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act ("FIRPTA") (a) Is the Seller subject to FIRPTA withholding per Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code? If yes, Buyer and Seller should seek legal and tax advice regarding compliance. Then Section 12: (If checked) Other Matters; Additional Comments The attached addendum contains additional information, explanation, or comments. Then the Seller representation paragraph. Then Seller signature lines (two of them). Then Buyer acknowledgment paragraph. Then Buyer signature lines (two of them). Then the footer text about page 4 of 4. Let me construct this properly. For the questions with checkboxes, I'll create a table structure. Actually, looking at the alignment, I should probably just list the questions and indicate the checkbox columns, but the user said "markdown tables for tabular data". The Yes/No/Don't Know section is tabular. Let me try: | | Yes | No | Don't Know | |:---|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **(f)** Are there any zoning violations or nonconforming uses? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(g)** Are there any zoning restrictions affecting improvements or replacement of the Property? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ...and so on. But the checkboxes in the image are empty squares. I should use ☐ or just indicate the column. Actually, looking at the image, the checkboxes are empty boxes. I can represent them as ☐ or just leave the cells empty with the understanding that they are checkboxes. But to be precise, I'll use ☐. Wait, the user said "Preserve all numbers, dates, and values exactly as shown." The checkboxes are part of the visual. I should include them. Let me proceed: ### Section 10 (continued) | | **Yes** | **No** | **Don't Know** | |:---|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **(f)** Are there any zoning violations or nonconforming uses? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(g)** Are there any zoning restrictions affecting improvements or replacement of the Property? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(h)** Do any zoning, land use or administrative regulations conflict with the existing use of the Property? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(i)** Do any restrictions other than association or flood area requirements, affect improvements or replacement of the Property? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(j)** Are any improvements located below the base flood elevation? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(k)** Have any improvements been constructed in violation of applicable local flood guidelines? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(l)** Have any improvements to the Property, whether by you or by others, been constructed in violation of building codes or without necessary permits? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(m)** Are there any active permits on the Property that have not been closed by a final inspection? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | | **(n)** Is there any violation or non-compliance regarding any unrecorded liens; code enforcement violations; or governmental, building, environmental and safety codes, restrictions or requirements? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | **(o)** If any answer to questions 10(a) - 10(n) is yes, please explain: _________________________________ _________________________________ ### 11. Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act ("FIRPTA") | | **Yes** | **No** | **Don't Know** | |:---|:---:|:---:|:---:| | **(a)** Is the **Seller** subject to FIRPTA withholding per Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code? | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | **If yes, Buyer and Seller should seek legal and tax advice regarding compliance.** ### 12. ☐ (If checked) Other Matters; Additional Comments The attached addendum contains additional information, explanation, or comments. **Seller** represents that the information provided on this form and any attachments is accurate and complete to the best of **Seller's** knowledge on the date signed by **Seller**. **Seller** authorizes listing broker to provide this disclosure statement to real estate licensees and prospective **buyers** of the Property. **Seller** understands and agrees that **Seller** will promptly notify **Buyer** in writing if any information set forth in this disclosure statement becomes inaccurate or incorrect. **Seller:** _________________________________ / _________________________________ **Date:** _______________                     (signature)                                          (print) **Seller:** _________________________________ / _________________________________ **Date:** _______________                     (signature)                                          (print) **Buyer** acknowledges that **Buyer** has read, understands, and has received a copy of this disclosure statement. **Buyer:** _________________________________ / _________________________________ **Date:** _______________                     (signature)                                          (print) **Buyer:** _________________________________ / _________________________________ **Date:** _______________                     (signature)                                          (print) **Seller** (______) (______) and **Buyer** (______) (______) acknowledge receipt of a copy of this page, which is Page 4 of 4. --- SPDR-3 Rev 2/20 Serial#: 098427-100160-2439651 ©2020 Florida Realtors® Form Simplicity Wait, I need to check the exact footer text. It says: "Seller (____) (____) and Buyer (____) (____) acknowledge receipt of a copy of this page, which is Page 4 of 4." And at the very bottom left: "SPDR-3 Rev 2/20" and "Serial#: 098427-100160-2439651" And bottom right: "©2020 Florida Realtors®" and the Form Simplicity logo text. Let me make sure I have all the text exactly right. Looking again at the image: For section 10, the questions are labeled (f) through (o), but the first one visible is (f). The user can see these are continuing from previous questions 10(a) through 10(e) which are not shown. The text for (o) has a blank line after it for explanation. For the signature lines, I should format them cleanly. The (signature) and (print) are centered under the lines. Actually, looking at the spacing in the image, the (signature) and (print) are labels under the signature lines. I can format this as: **Seller:** _________________________________ / _________________________________     **Date:** _______________                       (signature)                                           (print) Or I can use a table for signatures, but the user said markdown tables for tabular data. The signature layout is somewhat tabular but not really. I'll use the alignment approach with spaces or just list them. Actually, for clean markdown, I can do: **Seller:** _________________________________ / _________________________________ **Date:** _______________                     (signature)                                          (print) But the non-breaking spaces might not render well. Actually, in markdown, multiple spaces are collapsed unless in a code block. So I should not try to align with spaces. I'll just put the labels on separate lines or indicate the layout clearly. Let me check standard legal form transcription. Usually, it's done as: **Seller:** _________________________________ / _________________________________ **Date:** _______________ (signature) (print) But that doesn't show the alignment. Actually, looking at the image again, the (signature) is under the first line and (print) is under the second line (after the slash). Wait, looking carefully: "Seller: ________ / ________ Date: ______" And below: " (signature) (print)" Actually, looking at the image: The line is: "Seller: ________________ / ________________ Date: ____________" And underneath, aligned with the signature line: "(signature)" and aligned with the print line: "(print)" In markdown, I can write: **Seller:** _________________________________ / _________________________________ **Date:** _______________                     (signature)                                          (print) But as I said, spaces are collapsed. I could use a table for the signatures to make it clean: | **Seller:** | _________________________________ | / | _________________________________ | **Date:** | _______________ | |:---|:---|:---:|:---|:---|:---| | | (signature) | | (print) | | | But that might be overkill. Let me just transcribe the text as it appears, line by line. Line 1: Seller: _________________________________ / _________________________________ Date: _______________ Line 2: (signature) (print) - but with spacing. Actually, I'll just write it as: **Seller:** _________________________________ / _________________________________ **Date:** _______________ (signature)                                          (print) Wait, the (signature) is centered under the first blank, and (print) is centered under the second blank. Without precise spacing, I'll just put them on the same line separated by some indication. Actually, standard practice in legal document transcription is: Seller: _________________________ / _________________________ Date: ___________ (signature) (print) But using alignment that won't work in markdown. I'll format it as: **Seller:** _________________________________ / _________________________________ **Date:** _______________                     (signature)                                          (print) But since markdown collapses spaces, I'll use the HTML entity for space: ` ` or just not worry about perfect alignment and just put the text: **Seller:** _________________________________ / _________________________________ **Date:** _______________ (signature)                                          (print) Actually, looking at the instruction again: "Transcribe ALL visible text on this page as clean markdown." The most important thing is getting the text right. The alignment is secondary. I'll use a simple format that indicates the structure. Let me check if there are any other details I missed. At the bottom: "Seller ( ) ( ) and Buyer ( ) ( ) acknowledge receipt..." The parentheses are empty in the image: "Seller (____) (____) and Buyer (____) (____)" And "SPDR-3 Rev 2/20" is on the left. "©2020 Florida Realtors®" is on the right. Below SPDR-3 is "Serial#: 098427-100160-2439651" And "Form Simplicity" with a logo. Actually, looking at the bottom left corner: "SPDR-3 Rev 2/20" "Serial#: 098427-100160-2439651" And bottom right: "©2020 Florida Realtors®" [Form Simplicity logo] So I'll include all that. One more check: In section 11, the text "If yes, Buyer and Seller should seek legal and tax advice regarding compliance." is on a separate line below the question. In section 12, the checkbox is part of the section header line: "12. ☐ (If checked) Other Matters..." Let me make sure I have all the questions text exactly right: (f) Are there any zoning violations or nonconforming uses? (g) Are there any zoning restrictions affecting improvements or replacement of the Property? (h) Do any zoning, land use or administrative regulations conflict with the existing use of the Property? (i) Do any restrictions other than association or flood area requirements, affect improvements or replacement of the Property? (j) Are any improvements located below the base flood elevation? (k) Have any improvements been constructed in violation of applicable local flood guidelines? (l